<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding oneself, lost, in plain sight: Distress calls for satellite imagery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techoped.com/2009/03/04/finding-oneself-lost-in-plain-sight-distress-calls-for-satellite-imagery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techoped.com/2009/03/04/finding-oneself-lost-in-plain-sight-distress-calls-for-satellite-imagery/</link>
	<description>Like I always say, it takes confidence to quote yourself. - j.ello</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://techoped.com/2009/03/04/finding-oneself-lost-in-plain-sight-distress-calls-for-satellite-imagery/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techoped.com/2009/03/04/finding-oneself-lost-in-plain-sight-distress-calls-for-satellite-imagery/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>My first thought is that there&#039;s a standard of 3.

Any good scout knows to create three piles of stones, preferably with 3 stones in each pile on a small scale. This is supposedly why SOS was chosen in the days of Morse code, the short, three long, three short.


My second thought is that 3 dots may not be enough, so I suggest three connected triangles (also viewed as one large triangle, with a smaller inverted triangle in the middle). And then only do the graphical analysis on pictures/tiles that have had substantial updates to their appearance.

In any case, people lost at sea without a signal device (new &amp; improved, or not) are screwed no matter what.


3rd thought is cost-benefit analysis. You could spend 40Billion on this project, and save maybe 100 people a year, or spend 40billion and wipe out malaria, saving tens of millions of lives. Not nearly as cool to watch from space, but a better investment.

As for earth-directed lasers, Real Genius drove me away from supporting that a long time ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first thought is that there&#8217;s a standard of 3.</p>
<p>Any good scout knows to create three piles of stones, preferably with 3 stones in each pile on a small scale. This is supposedly why SOS was chosen in the days of Morse code, the short, three long, three short.</p>
<p>My second thought is that 3 dots may not be enough, so I suggest three connected triangles (also viewed as one large triangle, with a smaller inverted triangle in the middle). And then only do the graphical analysis on pictures/tiles that have had substantial updates to their appearance.</p>
<p>In any case, people lost at sea without a signal device (new &amp; improved, or not) are screwed no matter what.</p>
<p>3rd thought is cost-benefit analysis. You could spend 40Billion on this project, and save maybe 100 people a year, or spend 40billion and wipe out malaria, saving tens of millions of lives. Not nearly as cool to watch from space, but a better investment.</p>
<p>As for earth-directed lasers, Real Genius drove me away from supporting that a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

